REAL CONSERVATIVES VERSUS PSEUDO-CONSERVATIVES
I never supported nor
voted for another Republican (much less Democratic) candidate for President
until Ronald Reagan. His words and deeds
form an enduring political gospel that is very different from the beliefs of
the pseudo- conservatives in today’s Republican Party, who wrap themselves in
Ronald Reagan while undermining everything Reagan believed:
- Our goal ought to be the greatest degree
of individual freedom consistent with an orderly society.
- Government is not the solution to the problem, government is the problem.
George W. Bush and
his Republican Party are far more akin to Richard Nixon than Ronald
Reagan. Like Richard Nixon, George W.
Bush has apparently never seen a government power or program he doesn’t like—at
least as long as he runs the government.
His actions
demonstrate that he and his Republicans believe in:
* Unlimited presidential government
unfettered by the constitution;
* State capitalism in which government promotes
its favorites and regulates or indicts opponents out of existence;
* Using national defense as an excuse for
unlimited power;
* Narrowly defined values invoked to buy
political support at the expense of freedom (and I am Not talking about abortion,
I am pro-life, but the Framers of the Constitution tried to ensure that all
social issues were State and not Federal matters—read the 10th Amendment: if we forgot anything, the Federal Government
can’t do that either.).
George Bush and his
Republicans are called conservative simply because they are to the RIGHT of the
democrats, not because they support conservative principles.
Even Theodore
Roosevelt, who was known for his expansionist views of presidential power
thought it had some limits and said, "To announce that there must be no
criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president right or
wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the
American public."

Comments